How the review works

Plainview reviews are designed to be straightforward, contained, and led by the question you want answered.

The process exists to assess whether the person you’re engaging with online appears real and trustworthy — not to escalate situations or push outcomes.

Step 1 — You outline the situation

After purchase, you’re asked to complete a short Review Briefing Form.

The form allows you to:

• identify the person you’re engaging with online

• explain the nature of the interaction

• set out the specific questions or concerns you want examined

You can complete the form immediately, or later at a time that suits you.
A link is provided after checkout and also sent to you by email.

You’re not expected to diagnose the issue or know how to investigate it.
Your role is simply to explain what doesn’t feel right.

Step 2 — The investigation is carried out

The review is then carried out as a structured online investigation.

The work focuses on assessing the person’s digital footprint and the claims they are making about themselves, including whether:

• identity appears consistent

• key details align or conflict

• the overall picture is credible and coherent

The review is proportionate and contained.
It is focused on answering your questions, not expanding scope unnecessarily.

Step 3 — Findings are assessed and explained

Once the investigation is complete, the findings are analysed together rather than in isolation.

The aim is to understand what the information actually suggests when viewed as a whole — not to produce raw data or speculation.

Where something cannot be confirmed, that is stated clearly.

Step 4 — You receive a written assessment

You receive a written review explaining:

• what was identified

• where details align or do not align

• whether there are inconsistencies or red flags that genuinely matter

• what uncertainty remains, and why

Everything is explained in plain language, without jargon or exaggeration.