Can someone catfish you for months or even years?

Yes. Catfishing can continue for months or years. Regular messages, a detailed personal history and a familiar routine can all exist within a relationship built on a false identity.

The length of time you have known an account does not establish who controls it. The more useful question is which important details have been independently supported, rather than simply repeated throughout your conversations.

Has anyone really been catfished for years?

Kirat Assi’s experience, documented in the Tortoise podcast and Netflix film Sweet Bobby, involved an eight-year deception beginning with a Facebook connection in 2010. The friendship later became a romantic relationship.

Netflix’s account of the documentary describes how attempts to meet were repeatedly frustrated while the relationship continued.

This is one documented case, not a measure of how long catfishing usually lasts. It demonstrates that years of contact are possible without the identity being genuine.

How can someone maintain a false identity for so long?

An invented identity does not need to change every day. Someone can repeat a prepared background, reuse photographs and keep conversations away from details that could expose the deception.

Other accounts may appear to support the story. A supposed friend or relative might confirm an explanation, but that account is not independent evidence simply because it uses a different name.

For example, if the person introduces you to an online “colleague” who confirms their job, ask what establishes that the colleague is genuine. Two connected accounts can repeat the same claim without either proving it.

Why do daily messages feel like proof?

Daily contact gives you a shared history. You may have discussed family difficulties, celebrated birthdays and supported each other through ordinary days.

Those conversations can matter deeply to you. However, remembering what you said yesterday is different from establishing that the name, photographs or background you have been given are accurate.

Rather than dismissing the whole relationship or accepting it on familiarity alone, examine the particular claims that concern you.

Would a scammer really wait months before asking for money?

Yes. The Financial Conduct Authority’s review of 60 confirmed romance fraud cases found that offenders built relationships over weeks or months before requesting payments. Initial requests were often for small amounts.

That review concerned financial fraud. Catfishing can also occur without requests for money, so the absence of a payment request does not establish that an identity is genuine.

Never send money to someone you have only met online and have not met in person, however long you have been talking. This includes gift cards, cryptocurrency and payments on their behalf. Meeting someone does not make a financial request safe either.

Does a long-distance relationship mean I should be suspicious?

No. Distance, health, caring responsibilities and finances can limit opportunities to meet. Some people also freely choose relationships that remain online.

Consider whether the arrangement is understood and accepted by both of you. Someone saying honestly that they cannot arrange a visit is different from repeatedly claiming to have booked one and then asking you to solve another financial emergency.

You can respect a genuine difficulty while deciding that the arrangement no longer suits you.

What should I check after months of talking?

Start with the question you need answered, then review the evidence you already have.

Separate claims from independent information

Write down the important details they have given you: their name, occupation, location and relevant parts of their history. Note which are supported by sources outside the conversations.

A screenshot they send is still information supplied by them. Where possible, examine the original source.

Review the timeline

List significant events, promised meetings and changes in their account. Dates can help distinguish a misunderstanding from a contradiction.

Do not treat every change as suspicious. People move, change jobs and correct earlier mistakes. Focus on discrepancies that materially affect the identity or circumstances being presented.

Check where photographs and profiles lead

Look beyond whether a photograph appears elsewhere. Does the source support the name and background you were given, or suggest that someone else’s material has been copied?

A real person appearing in those photographs may be entirely uninvolved in the deception.

For a fuller checking process, read How do I know if I’m being catfished?.

What if I have already invested years in the relationship?

You may need time to consider what new information means. You do not have to resolve every question in one conversation or confront the person immediately.

Talk to someone you trust and keep relevant messages and profile details. You can pause contact, decline financial requests or postpone plans while you decide what to do.

The time you have already spent does not oblige you to continue. Equally, a long relationship alone is not evidence of deception. Base your next step on the facts you can establish and what you need now.

Can an investigation help with a long-running online relationship?

It may help when specific identity or background questions remain unresolved. A longer history can provide dates, usernames, photographs and claims to compare, although the amount of material does not determine how conclusive the findings will be.

Plainview Investigations uses specialist digital searches and research to uncover relevant connections and assess how the evidence fits together. The purpose is to explain which claims are supported, which conflict and which remain unanswered.

If you already suspect financial fraud, contact your bank or payment provider immediately. Report Fraud provides reporting guidance for England, Wales and Northern Ireland; in Scotland, contact Police Scotland on 101. Do not wait for an investigation report before seeking help.

Last reviewed: 5 October 2026.

← Back to Knowledge Centre